Sunday, June 21, 2009

Democracy rules OK?

Ask anybody. Democracy is the only fair, representative, noble, decent, transparent form of Government. Fascism and communism are totalitarian systems that stifle freedom of expression and repress opposition. Anarchy is synonymous with chaos, and nobody wants that.
Our views of different forms of Government are shaped by those organs of education and public opinion that determine most things for most people: the education provided by the State and the information delivered by the mass media. But what if we have been misinformed? How have our opinions been shaped, and by whom? How would we view the evils of Fascism and Communism if we had been taught a different history? What would our opinions be if, for example, we were told that both Fascism and Communism were totalitarian regimes sponsored by and controlled by the same hidden hands that now control the Western Democracies?
Well, here’s a few little known pieces of information. Little known because the education system and the media don’t tell you them……
Fascism: One thinks of course of Hitler and Mussolini. Both were funded into power by international Zionists and their American collaborators. In 1933 after an indecisive election Hitler was out of cash to fight another. Suddenly, he had enough to stage massive rallies, equip all his boys with smart uniforms, hire trains, take out newspaper advertisements, travel around in a fancy Mercedes, pay for mini movies to be shown in the picture houses, backhand a few people, buy half a million swastika flags on decorative poles. The money came from two sources: The Rothschild family and Prescott Bush , grandfather of George W Bush (you know, the George W that made his first million dollars in an oil business with the Bin Laden family. If you didn’t know that, it’s because you live in a “democracy”.) The money given was ,in today’s terms, equivalent to 100 million dollars. The Zionists wanted things to get very hot for European Jewry such that they’d leave their homes and businesses and move to the desert in Israel, which until fascism came along was an idea they treated with deserved scorn. Bush was in the scheme, and also saw a huge cash making opportunity from his association with Thyssen the arms manufacturer and from his banking services for the Nazis. (All historical facts you may not know, because you live in a “Democracy“). Did you know IBM built the machines that generated the numbers tattooed on the arms of the Jews on their way to the camps? No? It’s because you live in a “Democracy“.
Communism: Some pretty good ideas amongst all of that about equality and sharing and so on. So good, in fact, that the concept had to be discredited before it took off. International Zionists, again headed by the Rothschilds, funded and aided, directed and controlled the Zionist Lenin and all of his Zionist buddies. It was a useful method of disposing of the Tsars who weren’t playing ball with the international banking cartel and of creating a “boogeyman” regime so terrifying that communism would be discredited forever. They pulled off the same trick in China.
The same people control the “Democracies” of the first world, which is why you probably don’t know any of this. They control the newspapers you read, the news agencies that supply them with their stories, the TV channels (including the BBC, an institution rotten to the core at senior management level). They control the education systems, deliberately enfeebling and dumbing down the populace, ensuring that the “national curriculum” teaches nothing of value. Many years ago I taught history in schools in the UK at the time when the teaching of history was going through the phase of teaching historical method rather than boring old historical fact! Historical fact is not taught in UK history lessons. Which set texts are used are controlled by Government. The great majority of historical fact as taught in the UK are in fact historical lies. Too often even the teachers are unaware of the true histories and even if aware are too demoralised and depressed to do anything about it.
If this is your first time with some of this you probably think I’m talking through my hat and am crazy. That’s what you’ve been taught to think. If everything you have been taught has been controlled by the hidden hands of this vast conspiracy, if everything you read in the news or see on the TV is similarly controlled, how could you think otherwise? All I would ask you to do is research each statement I have made, then arrive at your own conclusions.
Here’s some helpful quotes from people who aren’t olive farmers…………..

Winston Churchill:
"From the days of Spartacus, Weishophf, Karl Marx, Trotski, Belacoon, Rosa Luxenburg, and Ema Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th Century. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire."

Benjamin Disraeli:
"For you see, the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.Governments do not govern, but merely control the machinery of government, being themselves controlled by the hidden hand"
"The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments' plans."

Albert Einstein:
"The ruling class has the schools and press under its thumb. This enables it to sway the emotions of the masses "

John F. Kennedy:
"The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight ....
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence - on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."

Woodrow Wilson:
"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the world - no longer a Government of free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men."

Franklin Delano Roosevelt:
"The real truth of the matter is...that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson..."

Theodore Roosevelt:
"Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an INvisible government owing NO allegiance and acknowledging NO responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul this unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of today."

Dwight D Eisenhower:
"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist."

David Rockerfeller:
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the NY Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings, and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop OUR PLAN for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a World Government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual ELITE and World Bankers is surely preferable to the national auto - determination practiced in past centuries.”

Bill Clinton:
"By the time you become the leader of a country, someone else makes all the decisions. You may find you can get away with Virtual Presidents, Virtual Prime Ministers, and Virtual Everything."

Edgar J Hoover:
"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists ."

Edward Bernays:
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in a democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power in our country... We are governed, our minds are moulded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested largely by men we have never heard of... We are dominated by a relatively small number of persons... It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind and who harness social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world."

Nathan Rothschild:
"I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply."

John Swinton (Editor, New York Times):
"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print.I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes. "

Oscar Calloway (US Congressman):
"In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States. These 12 men worked the problem out by selecting 179 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the country. They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. The 25 papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers; an agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers... This policy also included the suppression of everything in opposition to the wishes of the interests served."

Professor Stuart Crane:
"If you look back at every war in Europe during the Nineteenth Century, you will see that they always ended with the establishment of a 'balance of power.' With every re-shuffling there was a balance of power in a new grouping around the House of Rothschild in England, France, or Austria. They grouped nations so that if any king got out of line a war would break out and the war would be decided by which way the financing went. Researching the debt positions of the warring nations will usually indicate who was to be punished."

Arsene de Goulevitch: ( Official Russian Revolutionary Historian)
"The main purveyors of funds for the revolution, however, were neither the crackpot Russian millionaires nor the armed bandits of Lenin. The 'real' money primarily came from certain British and American circles which for a long time past had lent their support to the Russian revolutionary cause.... The important part played by the wealthy American banker, Jacob Schiff, in the events in Russia, though as yet only partially revealed, is no longer secret.... In April 1917, Jacob Schiff publicly declared that it was thanks to his financial support that the revolution in Russia had succeeded. In the Spring of the same year, Schiff commenced to subsidize Trotsky... Simultaneously Trotsky and Co. were also being subsidized by Max Warburg and Olaf Aschberg of the Nye Banken of Stockholm... The Rhine Westphalian Syndicate and Jivotovsky, ... whose daughter later married Trotsky. ... Mr. Bakhmetiev, the late Russian Imperial Ambassador to the United States, tells us that the Bolsheviks, after victory, transferred 600 million roubles in gold between 1918 and 1922 to Kuhn, Loeb & Company [Schiff's firm].""

New York Journal (1949)
"Today it is estimated by Jacob's grandson, John Schiff, that the old man sank about 20,000,000 dollars for the final triumph of Bolshevism in Russia. "

New York Times on the takeover of US education bt the Rockerfeller Foundation:
"Unblushing materialism finds its crowning triumph in the theory of the modern school. In the whole plan there is not a spiritual thought, not an idea that rises above the need of finding money for the pocket and food for the belly ... It is a matter of instant inquiry, for very sober consideration, whether the General Education Board, indeed, may not with the immense funds at its disposal be able to shape to its will practically all the institutions in which the youth of the country are trained.
If this experiment bears the expected fruit we shall see imposed upon the country a system of education born of the theories of one or two men, and replacing a system which has been the natural outgrowth of the American character and the needs of the American people ... The plans of the General Education Board call for careful examination"

The Manufacturers Record, Baltimore:
"Control, through possession of the millions massed in the Educational Trust, of two or three or four times as many millions of dollars in education makes possible control of the machinery and the methods of education. It makes it possible for the central controlling body to determine the whole character of American education, the textbooks to be used, the aims to be emphasized. Operating through State, denominational, and individual systems of schools and colleges, it gives the financial controller power to impose upon its beneficiaries its own views, good or bad, and thereby to dominate public opinion in social, economic and political matters. "

New Orleans Times:
"The case here is plainly stated. The fund which the General Education Board administers is largely provided by men whose interest in shaping public opinion upon certain matters of vital concern to society and to the State is very great. Whether their philanthropy serves as a cloak to attain the ends desired, or whether the plan is unselfishly conceived and the sinister influence unconsciously exerted, the effect is likely to be the same in the end.
The gifts are hedged about by restrictions and conditions, with the education board to name them and to see that they are complied with. Every college which shares in the largess poses as a supplicant, in a sense. Not only is its policy partially directed by the Board, but it is additionally influenced. wittingly or unwittingly, by the desires of its benefactors. "

Dr Maxner on Medical Training in the US:
"One of my major complaints from medical school was that we were never taught nutrition. Sure, we were told that an active lifestyle and healthy eating habits were needed to maintain a healthy constitution, but we were never taught anything but allopathic medicine(the standard western model). But it wasn't always that way, there was a time when American doctors had the freedom to utilize all possible ways to approach disease. That all changed in 1910 with the Flexner Report.The Flexner report "reformed" the study of medicine in the U.S. and Canada. Its author, Abraham Flexnor was a prominent Zionist with no medical credentials whatsoever yet with funding from Carnegie and Rockefeller brought about the birth of the corrupt modern day medical establishment. I would go as far as say that many MD's are little more then glorified prescription writers. The fine details are included in "Murder by Injection"
Frederick T. Gates' first present to Rockefeller was a plan to dominate the entire medical education system in the United States. The initial step was taken by the organization of the Rockefeller Institute of Medical Research
Abraham Flexner submitted a final report to Rockefeller which apparently was satisfactory in every way. Its first point was an emphatic agreement with the AMA's lament that there were too many doctors. The Flexner solution was a simple one; to make medical education so elitist and expensive, and so drawn out, that most students would be prohibited from even considering a medical career. The Flexner program set up requirements for four years of undergraduate college, and a further four years of medical school. His report also set up complex requirements for the medical schools; they must have expensive laboratories and other equipment. As the requirements of the Flexner Report became effective, the number of medical schools was rapidly reduced. By the end of World War I, the number of medical schools had been reduced from 650 to a mere 50 in number. The number of annual graduates had been reduced from 7500 to 2500. The enactment of the Flexner restrictions virtually guaranteed that the Medical Monopoly in the United States would result in a small group of elitist students from well to do families, and that this small group would be subjected to intense controls. "

Meanwhile in Canada:
"Between 1920 and 1935 the Rockefeller Foundation gave Canadian medical schools more than $5 million to modernize their teaching programs, construct new buildings for medical sciences and hire more full-time hospital and academic teaching staff — sweeping measures that changed the face of medical education in Canada. "

Of course Democracy would be great if only we could get rid of these unseen hands that control the way we are educated and think. If not, then Anarchy in it’s traditional meaning (that is, the absence of Government) becomes more attractive………..


Revolution Harry said...

Just wanted to let you know thatI always enjoy reading your posts OF. Keep them up.

Zeital said...

Very informative.

On the area delving into U.S financial support and investment in Nazi Germany; British and Soviet financial interests were also present. Prior to World War One, and gradual entanglement in European affairs the U.S.A was isolationist and attempted to keep to protectionist policies (defending its nascent establish industrialising economy) and sought to keep Spanish, French, and British ambitions at bay. These colonial nations made pacts with the U.S.A at expense and exclusion of the First Nations such as Seminoles in present day Florida. Indeed the U.S.A expanded relentlessly against the First Nations, but it is often overlooked that the U.S.A was very vulnerable against the expansionist maritime empires of Western Europe. Tsarist Russia under Tsar Alexander provided a measure of protection for the U.S.A against Anglo-French designs in the South.

The City of London had many financial interests in Germany (indeed after the Treaty of Versailles) this organisation expanded its financial influence throughout Eastern Europe (in the wake of dissolution of Russian and Austro-Hungarian Empires).

A CENTURY OF WAR: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order by William Engdahl.

CONJURING HITLER: How Britain and America made the Third Reich by Guido Giacomo Preparata

ARTICLE: Oil and the origins of the ‘War to make the world safe for Democracy’ by F. William Engdahl

ARTICLE: Halford MacKinder's Necessary War by F. William Engdahl